• Get Your War On

    Hey — do the Iraqis own their own oil fields yet? They’re all gonna be rich over there now, right?

    The latest Get Your War On has arrived.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Lord and Taylor on war

    The Lord and Taylor on why people go to war

    ·

    Categories:
  • Fascism: see NYC/NYPD

    Jimmie Breslin is right. Maybe it is time for some NYPD layoffs.

    A young woman began banging her paint bucket drum so hard we couldn’t hear anymore. I don’t know how many were in the march, which was kept on the sidewalk by too many police. As usual, far too many.

    The police at marches suggest the need for layoffs.

    The faces on the police were evidence of a deep belief that the First Amendment can have nothing to do with these scruffy kids and a jobless squatter. If they try to pick it up and use it, then swing a big black billy club to squash it. Who are they to stomp along the street and call George Bush names? They ought to watch their betters on television and acquire class.

    The following is from an immensely interesting transcript of Barbara Bush on an ABC-TV morning show. She was asked if she and her husband, the former president, watch television.

    “He sits and listens and I read books because I know perfectly well that – don’t take offense – that 90 percent of what I hear on television is supposition, when we’re talking about the news. And he’s not, not as understanding of my pettiness about that. But why should we hear about body bags and deaths and how many, what day it’s going to happen, and how many this or what do you suppose? Oh, I mean, it’s, not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that? And watch him suffer.”

    This is NY1’s latest story on the anti-war march:

    Several Arrested, Officers Injured In Largest Anti-War Rally Yet

    More than 20 people were reportedly arrested and at least 10 police officers were sprayed with Mace during an anti-war demonstration that drew an estimated 200,000 people to Manhattan Saturday afternoon.

    While the rally began as a peaceful one, violence broke out near Washington Square Park as police attempted to disperse the crowd at the scheduled 4 p.m. end of the rally. Several protesters were arrested and a number of police officers were sprayed with Mace as they tried to move crowds out of the area.

    “I was trying to disperse, you couldn’t get through because of a line of helmeted riot police,” said a woman who participated in the protest. “They started making a line and pushing the crowd back so you could not exit. They’re squeezing in people like rats because there’s no place to go and the police are provoking what’s going to be violent.”

    Riot officers and mounted police tried to get control of the crowd, announcing via loudspeaker about 5:30 p.m. that those who remained in the area could face arrest. Many protesters appeared defiant of the announcement, continuing to linger in the area and shouting “Our street” as officers tried to disperse crowds.

    The protest, which began at West 35th Street and finished in Washington Square Park, was estimated to be the largest anti-war rally the city has seen since the situation with Iraq first escalated.

    While tens of thousands were still marching, the NYPD decided that the city had had enough free speech for one day. I’m glad I finished earlier. I can hear all of the sirens going by my apartment on West 23rd Street.

    ·

    Categories:
  • March 22, 2003 Anti-War March

    I got back a little while ago from the big march from Times Square to Washington Square Park. It took over two hours to march the whole route, once it finally started moving around 1 or so. The crowd has huge, with each block quite crowded. Given that it was at least 30 blocks of people marching for hours, and typical estimates are 1000-1500 people/block, that’s in the 100,000-250,000 range.

    We marched in a group including ACT UP, Housing Works, Church Ladies for Choice, and an ad-hoc group assembled a few days ago of queer activists with the working title “Flaunting Peace”.

    More photos may be found here.

    Some favorite chants and signs:

    • How many persons/gallon?
    • Respect Democracy, Don’t “Install” It
    • How did our oil get under their sand?
    • “… a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind” — Declaration of Independence
    • No Iraqi children in my gas tank
    • Who’s pro-life now?
    • Pretzels for Peace
    • This was is so heteronormative
    • Baby Bombers ‘R US
    • 48 Hours / Leave the White House (chant that rose around Washington Square

    The ACLU/NYCLU was handing out a good flyer with “Know your rights while demonstrating.” Here is a PDF of it. After seeing cops on March 21 in Times Square telling people they couldn’t walk on the sidewalk while carrying anti-war signs but were required to go into the holding pens set up with barricades, it’s a good flyer to keep around.

    Here is a good article from Reuters on the protests.

    I just looked at CNN’s web site. Is this balance?

    Americans demonstrate for, against war
    100,000 gather in Manhattan

    Saturday, March 22, 2003 Posted: 3:29 PM EST (2029 GMT)

    NEW YORK (CNN) — Supporters and opponents of the ongoing U.S.-led military campaign in Iraq took to the streets Saturday in cities across the United States.

    I also hate the way all of the coverage — including NY1 and CNN — spend a lot of time talking about how nice it is that there was so little violence. Hello? They think that the people opposed to the war are the violent ones? NY1 also kept reminding viewers that the permit said the march would end at 4, but there were thousands still marching down Broadway, so “it should get interesting.” Are they hoping the riot police (there were a lot around Washington Square) would give them some interesting footage?

    On TV CNN also contrasted the anti-war demonstrations with smaller “support our troops” demonstrations near various bases around the country. It’s offensive to say that anti-war people are showing hatred for our troops. No wonder CNN was expelled by the Iraqis as a “propaganda tool of the government.”

    See also: James‘s account.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Feels good

    Minutes before the speech, an internal television monitor at the White House showed the President pumping his fist.

    “Feels good,” he said.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Fascism

    From Britannica Concise:

    fascism: Philosophy of government that stresses the primacy and glory of the state, unquestioning obedience to its leader, subordination of the individual will to the state’s authority, and harsh suppression of dissent. Martial virtues are celebrated, while liberal democratic values are denigrated. 20th-cent. fascism arose partly out of fear of the rising power of the lower classes and differed from contemporary communism (as practiced under J. Stalin) by its protection of the corporate and landowning powers and preservation of a class system.

    From a column by Richard Perle in today’s Guardian:

    Saddam Hussein’s reign of terror is about to end. He will go quickly, but not alone: in a parting irony, he will take the UN down with him. Well, not the whole UN. The “good works” part will survive, the low-risk peacekeeping bureaucracies will remain, the chatterbox on the Hudson will continue to bleat. What will die is the fantasy of the UN as the foundation of a new world order. As we sift the debris, it will be important to preserve, the better to understand, the intellectual wreckage of the liberal conceit of safety through international law administered by international institutions.

    From the NY Times:

    Even as he advises the Pentagon on war matters, Richard N. Perle, chairman of the influential Defense Policy Board, has been retained by the telecommunications company Global Crossing to help overcome Defense Department resistance to its proposed sale to a foreign firm, Mr. Perle and lawyers involved in the case said today.

    Mr. Perle, an assistant defense secretary in the Reagan administration, is close to many senior officials, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who appointed him to lead the policy board in 2001. Though the board does not pay its members and is technically not a government agency, it wields tremendous influence in policy circles. And its chairman is considered a “special government employee,” subject to federal ethics rules, including one that bars anyone from using public office for private gain.

    Mr. Perle is also a member of Project for the New American Century – the people that created Rebuilding America’s Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century in 2000: a plan for the U.S. to take military control of the Persian Gulf to create a “global Pax Americana”.

    Thanks to Lisa at Ruminate This for the links, and for inspiring this post.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Moscow Bombing, July 1941

    Moscow Bombing, July 1941 by Margaret Bourke-White, via gmtPlus9.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Digby on why protest matters

    Go read Digby on why protests are important.

    ·

    Categories:
  • Under cover of war

    While Americans were watching footage of missiles and files on CNN, the House passed (215-212) the Bush budget which includes a $726 billion tax cut and an estimated deficit of at least $350 billion. Note that the deficit number does not include any estimate of the costs of the Iraq war. The White House is expected to submit a request next week for “emergency spending” of about $80 billion.

    ·

    Categories:
  • One Nation over God

    This is nice. We’ve started an unprovoked war that looks to much of the world like a crusade against Muslims. The House of Representatives responds by passing this resolution:

    The nonbinding resolution, passed 400 to 7 with 15 members voting “present,” states that the phrase “one nation under God” in the pledge reflects the religious faith central to the founding of the nation and that its recitation is a patriotic act, not a statement of religious faith.

    Does this sound particularly religious to those of you that believe in such things? As Slacktivist points out:

    In other words, the phrase “one nation under God” an affirmation of America’s goodness and piety, not — as it would seem — a statement of humility before a sovereign God. The House resolution elevates patriotism above religious faith, and thus elevates America above God. This is more frighteningly imperial than anything even Richard Perle or John Bolton has said.

    Belief in a sovereign God places rather severe limits on the kind of patriotism the House seems to favor. If religious faith — freedom of conscience — is made subordinate to a loyalty oath of patriotism, then the First Amendment is meaningless.

    ·

    Categories: